Return-Path: <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19BB4048C4
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:52:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.455
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[AWL=-1.270, BAYES_40=-0.185] autolearn=ham
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id hejJPgSCDR+r for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:52:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qy0-f173.google.com (mail-qy0-f173.google.com
	[209.85.221.173])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8CE4048C1
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:52:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so674265qyk.2
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:52:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:subject
	:to:cc:in-reply-to:references;
	bh=i/OApnsAWTCKmwjnzi/CDn4/yxyc1VQvSXDdxqzgeRU=;
	b=F1Fi04li6XsDiV2dOpdeLTJkKzvE/amdNQV7yqWE0HJRS5Vais4Ov6WubFb/DU4EDy
	2Vok6lUeG4KOC9OFuIY0Wu3PI0pUQpI5dPOrdhGrBpo4d0+iNEhLzpn4XE8pw7kmGiQA
	/8LmpKSPgkw3rzOAnspyb98eKNeksx7VOAakg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:subject:to:cc:in-reply-to:references;
	b=a9BYsgGXPM/BBdaIuFV7RhwgL40zXXo/OQMFSgxTtYmIjqauKXPcyW8hHD4VS3ywdA
	oQK1UgxuF4roHkZmrd65Go2wVrcwbpSC4qd3cMpp8+uGU7pRU6dEhicl8v8YxorDLsCn
	vepxEhri9NTPp9odcHvo/gmWx8EDZMldiNKq0=
Received: by 10.224.93.146 with SMTP id v18mr98176qam.363.1268355158118;
	Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:52:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (physnat56.physics.umass.edu [128.119.50.56])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm1520955qwk.32.2010.03.11.16.52.36
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
	Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:52:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4b999055.86c3f10a.2492.24e6@mx.google.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:52:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
To: David A Benjamin <davidben@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1003111748020.9755@dr-wily.mit.edu>
References: <4b990b7b.0e67f10a.073c.0686@mx.google.com>
	<alpine.DEB.1.10.1003111748020.9755@dr-wily.mit.edu>
Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [notmuch] Notmuch command interface
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:52:39 -0000

On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:52:34 -0500 (EST), David A Benjamin <davidben@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> To avoid breaking the current behavior, what if the set of tags applied to 
> new/moved/deleted(?) messages could be set on the command line or some 
> other library interface, while just perhaps defaulting to unread/inbox? 
> This would support both the current behavior and a hooks-like workflow 
> without notmuch itself treating any tags (new, unread, inbox, etc.) as 
> "special".

Seems reasonable. I might take a stab at this. Anyone else have any thoughts
about the above?

- Ben