From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>,
	Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: problem with folder: search in python bindings
In-Reply-To: <877hbsfq4q.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
References: <87tyf4xmm1.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
	<87aagv2z92.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
	<87y64dk9da.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
	<877hbsfq4q.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-137-g2e489e3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
	(i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:32:52 -0700
Message-ID: <871v20bfij.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:29:57 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>=
 wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:19:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructu=
re.net> wrote:
> > Hey, Sebastian.  Can you share your notmuch.py script?
>=20
> No, it's my secret plan for earning my pension :).
> You already got it:
> http://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch/blob/HEAD:/bindings/python/notmuch=
.py

Thanks, Sebastian.  Very convenient of you to include it in the repo!

> Let me know what you find out.

So right off the bat I'm seeing a big discrepancy between the results
From=20notmuch and notmuch.py:

servo:~/src/notmuch/git [personal] 0$ notmuch count from:jrollins
34358
servo:~/src/notmuch/git [personal] 0$ ./bindings/python/notmuch.py count fr=
om:jrollins
34358
servo:~/src/notmuch/git [personal] 0$ notmuch count folder:sent
635
servo:~/src/notmuch/git [personal] 0$ ./bindings/python/notmuch.py count fo=
lder:sent
7
servo:~/src/notmuch/git [personal] 0$=20

As you can see, the two interfaces are returning the same results for
the "from:jrollins" search, but the binary is returning 635 results for
the "folder:sent" search while the python interface is returning 7.
That's a big discrepancy.  This must be related to the same problem I
was seeing with my test case.

I'm running notmuch.py from my "personal" branch, which is the same
branch that the binary has been compiled from.  My database has also
recently been rebuild from the same branch.

I really have no idea what could be going on here.  It's a stranger
result even than the one I was seeing before, since it is actually
returning *some* results.

Any suggestions about how we might go about debugging this?

jamie.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNh320AAoJEO00zqvie6q86M0QAKKaosIJaqYWq6Au1rmUa2lP
a+QFq21g+NrnaNf9iiqbBh5p2QuBd65cHlZ+sd4mVcCNTp2TxdvYoNMi51bp1SjM
LaXViBUjdxP5uwf1Foqbl7OCCHgZNPqnijsYrsLDfKgTIaKd4ED9/WlRxBdHSIwL
tFl570wojA3qf2YFWzjRqQx0yxmEsDEbgrYVgSmLd4FDKy8PsOCjl0L1uMXsxGy1
GGovm7eWkpOCZ1YGXRWQW3TE90nc++ZnnHIsexvE3Tl7mqGF8ov8StzvQ3ZzvJUl
Gv7vAF5Rqh0uxcJ44jKCM2BQ1k3XexL2R+qjjNtTRpuc3l0wnQALuw/2q1Jfddwf
7GDi40vCpusVMdr6uEmjzdmz2ow/jEQLBStbYSfPLz8SI88moTLbHTSJ03kEoaYt
SwnH74cSex8a0UEcYgCYhTN/dQhlj3baQ+vn1j+JUQ6rrnXzqzQW9NhH59g4w4wn
U5nFwLGLbAA9GOWinw4IK+bdrg14AjvNoT6TlkMPtEAvI0s2UNAb8BBVkurQ99wE
xq1wMZG+CLWUYjOhjBwGBh/bYevqs3F6SDXx8D42SEooGVE56nLqCkLgcODZQ+GA
IXhul6H50Sq51Pm5Wbw4zjZ5gB8sbcPWaCDEuyRUf8NCgn8Ho9+2ReVGFcipAqOr
UDaeq3FwdeSyMBSjqLHj
=Uf7s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--