Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF354196F3 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:14:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=unavailable Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xyq90jYpLXIU for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:14:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0674196F0 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:14:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=x200.gr8dns.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1O3CXc-0003Zt-BG; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:14:52 +0000 Received: by x200.gr8dns.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id A49A2C0163; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:14:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Dirk Hohndel To: Carl Worth , Jameson Rollins , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: The archive operation should only archive open messages In-Reply-To: <87r5me2j4e.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <87633sfnyq.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87aat4ph3y.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87r5me2j4e.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:14:51 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: notmuch version 0.1-133-g9560703 (Emacs 23.1.1/i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:14:54 -0000 On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:28:49 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:59:13 -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote: > > I actually *really* don't like that the space bar does this. In fact, I > > build my own notmuch-show-advance function in a notmuch-hacks.el that I > > load to expressly get around this. > > Well we definitely do need that operation ("advance to next thread > without archiving" to complement our existing "advance to next thread > after archiving"). Any suggestions for what the keybinding should be for > that? What are you using? I have been going back and forth about which key to use... My current favorite is 'k'eep. It kind of mirrors nicely with 'a'rchive. > And once we have that, changing space bar to only operate within the > current thread and not doing any advancing will definitely make it a lot > less magic and less confusing. Yes, please. /D -- Dirk Hohndel Intel Open Source Technology Center