Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6480431FBC for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 19:25:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.449 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.291, BAYES_20=-0.74] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qGigAi2tJk1j for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 19:25:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from clegg.madduck.net (clegg.madduck.net [193.242.105.96]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB43431FAE for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 19:25:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from lapse.rw.madduck.net (lapse.nz.madduck.net [IPv6:2001:4428:234::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "lapse.rw.madduck.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (verified OK)) by clegg.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTPS id 300F11D4099 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:25:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by lapse.rw.madduck.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5346B1BF; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:25:03 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:25:03 +1300 From: martin f krafft To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Message-ID: <20100210032503.GA19427@lapse.rw.madduck.net> Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org References: <87d4148s2c.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net> <4B595D3A.1030901@SSpaeth.de> <87636u34lw.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87d411zvz8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <20100125213231.GB15987@lapse.rw.madduck.net> <960df8f6a8a08f2ca3aceef5a216d691.squirrel@webmail.sspaeth.de> <87wrz4fqsw.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net> <20100127194149.GA23034@lapse.rw.madduck.net> <20100128070522.GA18649@ukfsn.org> <20100201223112.GA20288@lapse.rw.madduck.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100201223112.GA20288@lapse.rw.madduck.net> X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin' X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux squeeze/sid kernel 2.6.32-1-686 i686 X-Spamtrap: madduck.bogus@madduck.net X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at clegg X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [notmuch] patchwork test instance X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:25:16 -0000 --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable also sprach martin f krafft [2010.02.02.1131 +1300]: > I investigated some patch/issue trackers over the weekend. Here's my > summary/reply. >=20 > The executive summary is that > http://patchwork.madduck.net/project/notmuch/list/ now exists. > I have not really used it for anything real, so if some of you feel > inclined to give it a shot, sign up and triage away! Feedback > welcome. Are people actually using it? I know that merging patches is impossible, and that sucks, but otherwise: is this something to keep around, or should I take the site offline again? --=20 martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ =20 "time flies like an arrow. fruit flies like a banana." -- groucho marx =20 spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="digital_signature_gpg.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAktyJw8ACgkQIgvIgzMMSnUUqQCgo68HZXFPuqS4087ow3SRaogM tjQAnjIwMglzG1OHrOkEGuebCE221kEQ =hLWO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--