Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE7B431FD0 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:41:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y9dENhQDcxH8 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cryptobitch.de (cryptobitch.de [88.198.7.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EA3B431FB6 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.jade-hamburg.de (unknown [85.183.11.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cryptobitch.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F3F6505D09 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:41:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix, from userid 401) id 01ABBDF2A0; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:41:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de (unknown [IPv6:fe80::216:d3ff:fe3e:5058%br0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: teythoon) by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1AAE0DF28B; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:41:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from teythoon by thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R9R9y-0003aa-Df; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:41:02 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6873622514054999627==" MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <871uuzlrkt.fsf@SSpaeth.de> References: <1316999137-28257-1-git-send-email-4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> <871uuzlrkt.fsf@SSpaeth.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] python: add a .gitignore file and refine the toplevel one To: Sebastian Spaeth , notmuch@notmuchmail.org From: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:41:02 +0200 Message-Id: X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:41:09 -0000 --===============6873622514054999627== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sebastian, Quoting Sebastian Spaeth (2011-09-29 09:45:38) >Also, not all "status" are an error, e.g. DuplicateMessageId denotes >success rather than failure, it just communicates a status. I just stumbled upon the following comment in notmuch.h: /* Status codes used for the return values of most functions. * * A zero value (NOTMUCH_STATUS_SUCCESS) indicates that the function * completed without error. Any other value indicates an error as * follows: [...] Now I'm confused, could you clarify this? Thanks, Justus --===============6873622514054999627== Content-Type: application/octet-stream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=".signature" bG92ZSB1IGFsb3QgQCxACgo= --===============6873622514054999627==--