Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D194196F0 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:52:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cspTxh1+04ml for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:52:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.146]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88EF1431FC1 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:52:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 3so436807eyh.6 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:52:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.88.12 with SMTP id z12mr66070wee.165.1269273143333; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:52:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uf.hh.sledj.net (host83-217-165-81.dsl.vispa.com [83.217.165.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g11sm10274696gve.3.2010.03.22.08.52.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by uf.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 530DF594249; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:52:27 +0000 (GMT) To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <87iq8o76r8.fsf@uf.hh.sledj.net> References: <87iq8o76r8.fsf@uf.hh.sledj.net> From: David Edmondson Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:52:27 +0000 Message-ID: <87vdcobbgk.fsf@uf.hh.sledj.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [notmuch] JSON based emacs UI X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:52:25 -0000 On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +0000, David Edmondson wrote: > This is lightly tested, but if anyone else wants to give it a try I > would be interested in feedback. There were a couple of places in the > current code where I wasn't completely sure of the intention, so I may > have inadvertently diverged (notmuch-show-rewind is a good example). Oops, it doesn't remove the "unread" tag. dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org