Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EBD4196F0 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:11:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rSvFnLHiSFZy; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:11:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AE2431FC1; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:11:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 63FE6568F2D; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:11:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Sebastian Spaeth , Notmuch developer list , David Edmondson Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] Restructure notmuch-hello-reflect In-Reply-To: <1272631365-27995-1-git-send-email-Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> References: <1272630482-27386-1-git-send-email-Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> <1272631365-27995-1-git-send-email-Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-22-g1d528f8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:11:13 -0700 Message-ID: <87typjejxa.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:11:24 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:42:45 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth = wrote: > Just for the record, this is the final cleaned up version.=20 > Still not sure if dme sees it as an improvement though :-) David, Any comment here? Both versions are fairly equally opaque to me, but I didn't write either of them. ;-) =2DCarl =2D-=20 carl.d.worth@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMCESh6JDdNq8qSWgRAslnAJ9QhUy9vYzB2BdUHmcygTdM6O84tACeKRN4 aOyNEcW+ktweO0gfNf2kFLs= =GXdL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--