From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: <yunk4xhq4nz.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
References: <1258493565-13508-1-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com>
	<87d43axi4e.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <yunocmup24i.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
	<87zl6eeydr.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <yunk4xhq4nz.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:31:04 +0100
Message-ID: <873a4521nb.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Make notmuch-show 'X' (and 'x') commands
 remove inbox (and unread) tags
Precedence: list

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:52:00 -0800, Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> wrote:
> I'd take 'x' for 'return to search view; otherwise you're going to wear
> out my pinky reaching for the shift key. That leaves us with three
> commands:
> 
> 'a': advance to next message, archiving current thread, marking read
> messages. ('A' forces all messages in thread to be marked as read)
> 
> 'x': exit to search view, archiving current thread, marking read
> messages. ('X' forces all messages in thread to be marked as read)
> 
> 'q': quit back to search view, leaving thread tags unmodified.

OK. You win. That looks pretty good to me.

> There's a slightly weird asymmetry here -- there's no way to advance to
> the next thread and not mark messages.

Well, there's "q, n, RET" at least. ;-)

-Carl