Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF3D41733A for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:20:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bJ+MkYz-QS26 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:20:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ew0-f210.google.com (mail-ew0-f210.google.com [209.85.219.210]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF12B431FC1 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so700654ewy.0 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.37.82 with SMTP id w18mr887067ebd.97.1269127246715; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ellen.idiomdrottning.org.handgranat.org ([83.251.93.216]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm943003ewy.11.2010.03.20.16.20.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:20:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4ba5584d.1067f10a.15a4.4bef@mx.google.com> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:22:13 +0100 From: Sandra Snan To: notmuch User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) References: <4ba01c54.9298cc0a.66cd.7695@mx.google.com> <4ba237eb.0d67f10a.0fba.0105@mx.google.com> <4ba5558c.9753f10a.29f6.11d1@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <4ba5558c.9753f10a.29f6.11d1@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [notmuch] Tag search peculiarities X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:20:50 -0000 On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:09:00 -0700 (PDT), Ben Gamari wrote: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:27:12 +0100, Sandra Snan wrote: > > Hey, Ben. > > Ben Gamari wrote: > > > notmuch tag -new tag:new and tag:list notmuch tag -new +inbox tag:new > > > > Is there a new line between the calls? Like: > > notmuch tag -new tag:new and tag:list # removes new from list > > notmuch tag -new +inbox tag:new # replaces those that still are new with inbox > > > Eh? They are two separate notmuch invocations. In my mail (quoted above) it showed up as one single line, a single invocation. Guess there was mail problem somewhere. Thanks for the clarification. > Yeah, poor choice of words. After the two commands above ran, my mailing list > messages were tagged with new, inbox. And not list? Huh. Does seem weird that after explicitly replacing new with inbox, as you did, you still have them new.