From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: priorities for 0.13
In-Reply-To: <87ehr6fhtj.fsf@zancas.localnet>
References: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87ehr6fhtj.fsf@zancas.localnet>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+128~g0f26d91 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:50:58 +0100
Message-ID: <87397m5nbx.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Precedence: list


On Sun, 29 Apr 2012, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
> David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:
>
>> Hi All;
>>
>> I'd like to have a feature freeze for 0.13 sometime in the first week of
>> May.  What do people feel are priorities to try to get reviewed and
>> pushed for 0.13?
>>
>
> So here are some patches that people expressed interest in for 0.13, but
> need more review.
>
>      id:"1335056093-17621-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca"
>
>      id:"1334431301-27303-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com"
>
>      id:"1335651473-19652-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu"
>
> Note that in particular it makes sense to push amdragon's changes while
> we are bumping the SONAME.
>         
> The sequence by Jamie
>
>     id:"1334429574-12918-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"
>
> Has only one minor comment about a comment; I'm not sure it's enough for
> a rebase on it's own.  Mark, what do you think?

Hi

I think Jamie already posted a patch with a nicer comment 

id:"1334436547-10260-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"

(ie that replaces 2/5 in the original series)

In any case don't let the comment hold everything up: we can correct
that later if we care (and it does not matter to users)

Best wishes

Mark