Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57171431FBC for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 00:52:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GVYpdwmKi0RA for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 00:52:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85A7431FAE for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 00:52:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp06.online.nl (smtp06.online.nl [194.134.42.51]) by mx.perfora.net (node=mxus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MV7Yb-1Nc5bY1xlt-00YSrt for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:52:02 -0500 Received: from smtp06.online.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp06.online.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3AC96259; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:51:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from gopher (s55919504.adsl.wanadoo.nl [85.145.149.4]) by smtp06.online.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:51:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by gopher (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 46ABD232262; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:51:58 +0100 (CET) From: Marten Veldthuis To: Carl Worth , Michael Alan Dorman , notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <87hbs6dzjd.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <1259267025-28733-1-git-send-email-dottedmag@dottedmag.net> <1259788526-14205-1-git-send-email-dottedmag@dottedmag.net> <87zl5zfty5.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87k4x29732.wl%bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca> <87bpiefwdq.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87aaxysjdj.fsf@vertex.dottedmag> <87aaxyfuz4.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <20091204140946.644243f0@vimes.local> <87hbs6dzjd.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:51:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87hbs5u7kh.fsf@home.veldthuis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Online-Scanned: by Cloudmark authority (on smtp06.online.nl) Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH (rebased)] Handle message renames in mail spool X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:52:03 -0000 On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:39:50 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > But when viewing an actual message, I'm still planning on having notmuch > just return an arbitrary filename from the list of filenames associated > with that message. Does anyone see any problem with that? Can you think > of a case where you'd really care about seeing one or the other of > a particular duplicated message? As long as it's deterministic. But if you don't display the first filename received, couldn't you exploit this by spoofing message ids? -- - Marten