Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CCD431FAF for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 09:39:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2kkl5kQHiARJ for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 09:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3763B431FAE for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 09:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([77.12.75.61]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LcBPV-1XFxF73OxJ-00jaas for ; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:39:04 +0200 From: john.wyzer@gmx.de To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Feature suggestion. Indexing encrypted mail? User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:38:01 +0200 Message-ID: <86k3b3ybo6.fsf@someserver.somewhere> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:7wZACX6FFg+MUG7ZwRQSuS/gngVnKjA99yLAOYBXrkyUdEN1/gJ X4rx/SIVa6OlNkAQAkcIkosJOCuDQRGLs6xShW54sD30OxrYvVR1/bc1nCaN9LrXBESDRMk E9fjOhx4u2yMob6B+7tBqBMUUlschcSIFIzJTwR2FjPfZQ5Rzah4Y3o1Jgz8MYhI4ByP9aw P1Nwv2jvA/cxXaKk28kEw== X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 16:39:12 -0000 Hello! Would it be possible to add the configurable option to also decrypt encrypted messages on the fly while indexing to make them searchable, too? That would be really great for people that consider gnupg mainly an encryption for transport or have their complete hard drive encrypted... Best regards! John