Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2C2431FC1 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:52:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=unavailable Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bBiNTOrkOUSr for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:52:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3E64196F0 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:52:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=x200.gr8dns.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1O6ZyV-00022f-Uz; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:52:36 +0000 Received: by x200.gr8dns.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 8A5F1CC9E3; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:52:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Dirk Hohndel To: Carl Worth , David Edmondson , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: More DWIM when editing messages In-Reply-To: <87tyqxlr5r.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <1272290485-14217-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> <87d3xmdsxq.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87tyqxlr5r.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-237-gd9d399e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:52:36 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:52:37 -0000 On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:39:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:28:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > This appears not to have gone out??? Must be that weird MUA that I'm > > using... > > Strange. I couldn't find it earlier, and now I have both versions > here. So blame me, (or the weird MUA that I'm using...). Nope, wasn't you - my MTA (not MUA) had stalled the message. When I noticed, both went out at the same time (which you can see from the headers) > > The existing code inserts the signature before inserting the message > > body (which it puts at the very end of the buffer - therefore AFTER > > the signature). This little snippet makes us search backwards and > > insert the message body before a signature, if it exists. > > Works great. This is pushed. Thanks /D -- Dirk Hohndel Intel Open Source Technology Center