Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF519429E20 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 13:14:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KVdwaYfr9PTR for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 13:14:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DBA9431FB5 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 13:14:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so3126496fxm.26 for ; Sat, 07 May 2011 13:14:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=Ruot4C4xlTkKmjSyeRZhu5+y9voyUNjNXJrF2wb5RUA=; b=F4e5iKQfb9YnyAaJFrJs+6pmuzsplBML7MSxtrBFLACStrBtd5CacDQiVrKCvty8bw 2/iZe91haEhIuXIJkwRkVwnbeRs0lw/dBd/0wo2jKcEncMjMPus1eYMiTRxL44l0cSZn U58S1jv3IvXeTVpj3vaBIlH0PD3vlWVM20BKw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=Blk6DFbjgIY5bBonxt7iQhqSObhoq0n7j+mj0VE3ZjgMJkM23BnyyetWP4/580LXkV jGuSDhKDzoZAmC+RUUDZXX8duyntS+UDRO/jhD+iT5dNeJWLCGloijJPSigTqQDprCTE 1mTu9n2aMY7+S93I1BYufl9BM+nHzFglMB/Hk= Received: by 10.223.144.138 with SMTP id z10mr1898034fau.65.1304799243852; Sat, 07 May 2011 13:14:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r26sm1478328fam.10.2011.05.07.13.14.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 07 May 2011 13:14:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Dmitry Kurochkin To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: release-candidate/0.6 In-Reply-To: <8762pn7gth.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> References: <8762pn7gth.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-101-g4590090 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 00:14:22 +0400 Message-ID: <87wri2e09t.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Edmondson X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 20:14:06 -0000 Hi Jameson. First of all, thank you for your effort on notmuch. It is a great project and I am happy to see it going forward (again)! Can we include FCC fix in the 0.6 please? It was broken in 0.5 (IIRC) because of old configuration check. There are two patches on the ML to address it. The first one is from Carl id:"1290632444-10046-1-git-send-email-cworth@cworth.org" where the check is just commented out. Another one is a proper fix from David id:"1290682750-30283-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org". It is part of a patch series that adds some ERT (Emacs Lisp Regression Testing) support. I see few options: apply a "fix" from Carl, apply ERT patch series from David, or factor out the proper fix from David's series and apply it separately. Not sure what is the best. Perhaps David can comment about the ERT stuff. I am fine with any option, just do not leave it as is, i.e. broken. I am ready to help with the factoring out the proper fix, if all agree it is the best solution and no one (David?) volunteers for it. Thank you, Dmitry