Return-Path: <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8801431FD0
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 10:33:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.799
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id pGpgkHg9fLrC for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sat, 24 Dec 2011 10:33:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com
	[209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E4E7431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 10:33:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wibhq2 with SMTP id hq2so4569267wib.26
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 10:33:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id
	:mime-version:content-type;
	bh=JasUUKnJi1omt6uXlUpR6kKX8e4iwzw/70T/p61e5bA=;
	b=K2vLFQ9t4b0rn1ttLyXtnQPbQoGKt8dXIc4PnYLHYI8W/DWbp27mc2uFBTEucMsYqT
	YRxxtmyOUMXU4MABkEE/UfuGc9BCRr6TER1BLxMO/47RlI6potMmlNZnUCBzt+V+Urh9
	uwXWhYt1k14c5ot1URd2/jBLo8bg4NdQrUHQc=
Received: by 10.180.8.229 with SMTP id u5mr41907613wia.9.1324751593632;
	Sat, 24 Dec 2011 10:33:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ep13sm18141655wbb.8.2011.12.24.10.33.12
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Sat, 24 Dec 2011 10:33:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] emacs: use a single history for all searches
In-Reply-To: <1324698436-8532-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
References: <1324698436-8532-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+116~g4c449d4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:32:27 +0400
Message-ID: <87r4ztkeh0.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 18:33:19 -0000

I got some positive feedback for replacing notmuch-hello search input
with a button wich would call `notmuch-search' and read input from
minibuffer as usual.  This way we do not have to maintain 2 search
interfaces and get history, tab completions and other minibuffer
features in notmuch-hello search without having to reinvent the wheel.

So I plan to go with this approach and this patch series is obsolete.

Regards,
  Dmitry