Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD200429E26 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:14:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n9wpCM6lAz-H for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:14:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C5E429E25 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:14:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from zancas.localnet (fctnnbsc36w-156034079193.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net [156.34.79.193]) (authenticated bits=0) by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBE0EsK6028645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:14:55 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1RacUo-0005NE-9z; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:14:54 -0400 From: David Bremner To: Jameson Graef Rollins , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: optionally print subtest number In-Reply-To: <87sjko2gx1.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <1323806207-31888-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <87zkew2jtu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87d3bsjc1z.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87sjko2gx1.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+80~g144897e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:14:54 -0400 Message-ID: <87aa6wj9fl.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:14:58 -0000 On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:25:14 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:18:16 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > > We don't actually have test names, at least not ones directly suitable > > for file names. I guess we could encode them or something, is that what > > you mean? > > Don't we? There is at least a word/phrase that's consistent between the > actual test script names, what is listed in the TESTS variable (below), > and what is output when the tests are run (ie. "basic:" or > "search-folder-coherence:"). Are those not test names? OK, we can call those test names. This thread/patch is about "subtest numbers", so finer granularity. There are an average of 10 subtests per test, those are are the things that don't have names. d