Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C86F431FBF for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 13:51:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FrM31grG4r+9 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 13:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu [18.9.25.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFF4D431FBC for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 13:51:09 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 1209190c-f79946d000000c3b-b3-5377cbbc2a21 Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 95.4B.03131.CBBC7735; Sat, 17 May 2014 16:51:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id s4HKp8i6017744 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 16:51:08 -0400 Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id s4HKp6Yq015778 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 16:51:08 -0400 Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WllZS-0008BG-Ka for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 16:51:06 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 16:51:06 -0400 From: Austin Clements To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Known-broken test for overlapping/adjacent termpos Message-ID: <20140517205106.GK27619@mit.edu> References: <1400359552-10928-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1400359552-10928-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrLIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6norvndHmwwcRtBhbXb85kdmD0eLbq FnMAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxt49jSwFHawVFye9YWxgnMLSxcjJISFgIvGufS0zhC0mceHe erYuRi4OIYHZTBIrPy9gA0kICZxnlNi5sxwi8ZJJ4umiG1BVhxgl5l//xwhSxSKgKrHwUisr iM0moCGxbf9ysLiIgLTEzruzweLCAr4SrdNXsoPYvAI6Er8v7GaB2OAgcWvtHWaIuKDEyZlP wOLMAloSN/69ZOpi5ACypSWW/+MACXMKOErM7D0ONkZUQEViysltbBMYBWch6Z6FpHsWQvcC RuZVjLIpuVW6uYmZOcWpybrFyYl5ealFuoZ6uZkleqkppZsYQaHKKcmzg/HNQaVDjAIcjEo8 vAn2ZcFCrIllxZW5hxglOZiURHmPnSoPFuJLyk+pzEgszogvKs1JLQaGBwezkghv5mygHG9K YmVValE+TEqag0VJnPettVWwkEB6YklqdmpqQWoRTFaGg0NJgpcPGJNCgkWp6akVaZk5JQhp Jg5OkOE8QMOngCzmLS5IzC3OTIfIn2JUlBLn1QVJCIAkMkrz4HphqeQVozjQK8K880CqeIBp CK77FdBgJqDBb/aWggwuSURISTUwxi2v5HgrViTmov62dYfRBe5lK35wfCgRZ5i7x2bt7v8u u60uTJip/V5p9pzouhp7hV9SNcEu4vpMpyvOm2bu9zpYa28t9pUv9PGBKJPzwoplq/56pC61 0r/07+aGUA7v4tlSmteZZyY89on/ts+kY/735l/yJhttdK8xJOYlKIk+ffT35991SizFGYmG WsxFxYkAYKAMagADAAA= X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 20:51:16 -0000 Quoth myself on May 17 at 4:45 pm: > This adds two known-broken tests and one working test related to the > term positions assigned to terms from different headers or MIME parts. > The first test fails because we don't create a termpos gap between > different headers. The second test fails because we don't adjust > termpos at all when indexing multiple parts. After sending this I realized that we already have some very closely related tests in T110-search-position-overlap-bug. These tests should probably all be together, though obviously the tests I just sent wouldn't belong in something called "search-position-overlap-bug".