DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
	:mime-version:content-type;
	b=S19bzXRlWA/grI8emvXnRE43hj1joyAj+s8SKElijAyYEDWBK0RkU6ECfOZBPcJkQU
	fw89H52r+yAjqQUIeAN6oLG94U2T4DT19bY4JvCzz39WjBau0YsJ6GXX4rSUNJZxHSkQ
	cRJ6scIKG3n3he9ZWAxwxZyEraEqRyjsKEoZM=
From: Alexander Botero-Lowry <alex.boterolowry@gmail.com>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, camalot@picnicpark.org,
	notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: <87iqcvtest.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
References: <1259328615-1445-1-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org>
	<1259328615-1445-2-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org>
	<1259328615-1445-3-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org>
	<1259328615-1445-4-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org>
	<1259328615-1445-5-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org>
	<87iqcvtest.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:23:19 -0800
Message-ID:
 <86bpinql2w.fsf@fortitudo.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Keith Amidon <keith@nicira.com>
Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 4/9] Factor out message buffer mgmt from
 notmuch-show-view-all-mime-parts
Precedence: list

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:10:42 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:30:10 -0800, camalot@picnicpark.org wrote:
> > From: Keith Amidon <keith@nicira.com>
> > 
> > The ability to temporarily create a buffer containing only the
> > contents of the currently selected message in notmuch show mode is
> > generally useful.  This commit factors the majority of the code
> > required to do so out of notmuch-show-view-all-mime-parts into a macro
> > called with-current-notmuch-show-message and rewrites the original
> > function in terms of the macro.
> > 
> > A future set of commits will provide additional functionality using
> > the macro as well.
> 
> Hurrah! I'm glad to see that you are wholly more capable with emacs lisp
> than I am. I knew of lisp macros of course, but didn't know the actual
> syntax for writing one.
> 
I actually did something similar for my html support. except I used
`with-temp-buffer' macro instead. I'm hoping that the need to ever
actually use the raw message buffer directly goes away, so I think it
would be better to use with-temp-buffer in your macro instead of the
named buffer.

Alex