From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
To: Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>,
	Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>,
	Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: problem with folder: search in python bindings
In-Reply-To: <87oc54tlou.fsf@gogo.home>
References: <87tyf4xmm1.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
	<87aagv2z92.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
	<87y64dk9da.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
	<877hbsfq4q.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
	<871v20bfij.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87tyewtobx.fsf@gogo.home>
	<87hbaw9y3e.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87oc54tlou.fsf@gogo.home>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-137-g2e489e3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
	(i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:01:24 -0700
Message-ID: <87ei609wuj.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:42:09 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu> wr=
ote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:34:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructu=
re.net> wrote:
> > It's going to take a lot more digging before I can identify what is
> > common about these messages and different from all the messages that are
> > not returned.=20=20
>=20
> One guess: do those messages happen to have "folder:sent" in the
> body? If so, that might point to the possibility that the python
> bindings are using a different libnotmuch. Perhaps they have a different
> search path (and maybe there's a debian installed library around that
> they're finding?).

Oh good call, Jesse.  Bonus points for you!  That was the problem.  Damn
it.  In retrospect that's so obvious, though, isn't it!  I had purged
the notmuch binary package, but had accidentally left libnotmuch1 and
libnotmuch-dev installed.  Removing those packages and pointing to my
locally installed libraries fixed the problem.

Sorry for spamming the list with what, in retrospect, I should have been
able to figure out on my own.  Thanks again, Jesse.

jamie.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNh5J0AAoJEO00zqvie6q8MG0QAJ/vMz5+gXbtTS9hYPepYxQ9
a0gCijTtG1fPaMEbyzuS3jHgikCxXWBZelIbRmLSNLUgsbiW3UpucIJkcJamECIT
8dJonjzZlfqywraFcF+7t7FAJl0uNFg8njKs1lDEC9SDYJFVvEvQMFdGRWuipa0U
fyAvvnlM/GLZLru1i0Hx4rFqS7qQbqGEotnDFZyxN17d/zef+KOtjAfvVSNsqRcO
EH11xXz/YlidhCLAFsCBFXb/Cw9f4oxExIjL5xdMsgkZx9NaXaU/1AaG7eBUp4/8
mJWQg4LT97srkI7MPZ9RJRzXgWFF/CG1wwNLxuhy9h1DBYMqclI4E+BhqgLl1YLl
flV3QRAMut+2FNolQ3H1QJXHx39ty93kk1SBEJi81W6kW1lC83uXTD60/JBY18NM
Gh9egFSqJ5pbi719ZBJzeygXCjOefa4Q7L9pdMVEQiOfHxaCK9op3ym6QYAmZtU4
QGX8Amdbsors9Nb0RFT8mO25XavDZIoEtPqmNZCdtl6eSRq4mYBvKz7sTVA9ETOi
R6qWP2lhFPCwfLMYMpAdJdpE3pkP08DQe/CrSs4z+70UYxtiygeBq0lH57/0bf7F
DAxPAz/ftvLrpraky7Z+GM6J/Sk3aLEqXk8xQkeG0SMH0zYeSG9ttkR8aiPLqKpP
Lw02eFwItOKpIVcZXCLY
=5l+c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--