Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884F3431E64 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:04:51 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Huy4GEhcycQK for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:04:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipex4.johnshopkins.edu (ipex4.johnshopkins.edu [128.220.161.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5DE9431FAF for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:04:50 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,502,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="142919252" Received: from unknown (HELO watt) ([10.161.33.18]) by ipex4.johnshopkins.edu with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 29 Feb 2012 10:04:50 -0500 Received: from jkr by watt with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S2l5g-0006DO-GZ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:05:16 -0500 From: Jesse Rosenthal To: Tom Prince , David Bremner , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: Replacing my name/email with "me" (or similar) in author lists In-Reply-To: <87ehth8dd2.fsf@hermes.hocat.ca> References: <20120226112210.5422.8471@brick.lan> <87ehthfsyn.fsf@schoepe.localhost> <87fwdxk062.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87ehth8dd2.fsf@hermes.hocat.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+192~g36ce7e3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.93.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:05:16 -0500 Message-ID: <878vjl3ck3.fsf@jhu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:04:51 -0000 On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:59:53 -0500, Tom Prince wrote: > It is probably overkill for any one feature, but it does seem like > something useful to have. So maybe it would be worthwhile to create > for this one feature, even it it is overkill. I can think of other features where some layer like this would be useful. It would be great, for example, if it were possible to output search lines with recipients instead of senders, for the purposes of a "tag:sent" sort of window. (I actually have my own cobbled-together python thing which, connected with my other cobbled-together python remote thing, intercepts search calls for that tag and gives me a search view with non-me recipients. But obviously, as much as I love cobbling, it would be even better not to have to do that.) Best, Jesse