Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AF8429E35 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 06:25:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v6oZBsHkJaHv for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 06:25:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 558C3429E2F for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 06:25:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WAKSK-0001p9-16; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:25:00 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 31247 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:24:55 -0000 From: David Bremner To: "W. Trevor King" , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] In-Reply-To: References: <877g9chbay.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+56~gb9c3d8e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:24:54 -0400 Message-ID: <877g9cjmtl.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:25:16 -0000 "W. Trevor King" writes: > > p.s. I checked a few earlier patches on the list and didn't see > reviewer CCs. On the other hand, I didn't see any Reply-To headers > either, so I'm CCing my reviewers to be safe ;). Let me know if the > convention is to not CC reviewers, and I'll restrict future > submissions to notmuch@. I would say this list is CC friendly. Most (?) of us read it with notmuch, and don't see the CC's as extra messages. d