Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FFB431FC0;
	Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:46:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 5K+ndKzBOXmA; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:46:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D74D431FBC;
	Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:46:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: Adrian Perez <aperez@igalia.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: <1258589242-4871-1-git-send-email-aperez@igalia.com>
References: <1258589242-4871-1-git-send-email-aperez@igalia.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:45:47 +0100
Message-ID: <87skcb5olg.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Allow lone "not" search operators
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:46:03 -0000

On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:07:22 +0100, Adrian Perez <aperez@igalia.com> wrote:
> As suggested by Keith in FLAG_PURE_NOT allows for expressions like:
> 
>   notmuch search NOT tag:inbox

Oh, fantastic! I guess I'd run into enough QueryParser bugs recently
that I was willing to blame it without cause this time.

And I *thought* I had looked carefully at all the QueryParser tags to
choose all the useful ones, but clearly I missed this one.

Anyway, thanks for the research and the fix. This is pushed now.

Happy hacking,

-Carl