Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A76431FC4 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 09:16:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.438 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EXTsnpZaA8RL for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 09:16:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B411431FC2 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 09:16:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YCtR2-0007rQ-8a; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:14:48 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 30549 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:14:35 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cli: crypto: S/MIME verification/decryption support In-Reply-To: References: <1421568167-18683-3-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+27~g29ffde4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 18:14:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87vbk4roxw.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:16:52 -0000 Jani Nikula writes: > The notmuch-show flags --decrypt and --verify will now also process > S/MIME multiparts if encountered. Requires gmime-2.6 and gpgsm. > > Based on work by Jameson Graef Rollins . > I tend to agree this version is a bit easier to read, if a bit longer. Jamie, do you have any objections? I haven't tried this version with the tests in this thread.