Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3534196F0 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:21:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PjsGracdOyyB; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB0E431FC1; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7E93925400A; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:21:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: dme@dme.org, notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: Fix `notmuch-hello-insert-tags' to correctly draw the tags. In-Reply-To: <1272362677-22492-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> References: <1272362677-22492-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> <1272362677-22492-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-251-g8514e59 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:21:29 -0700 Message-ID: <87och4ncp2.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:21:30 -0000 --=-=-= On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:04:37 +0100, dme@dme.org wrote: > Carl, this is a fix for a regression that I caused this morning when > fixing the line wrapping. Serves me right for doing more than was > really necessary in the previous patch. Sorry :-( Well, that's how we all learn at least! :-) I've merged this one and the previous one. Thanks, -Carl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFL1wD56JDdNq8qSWgRAqSPAKCpbQ3OXuscpUY7TosZxLqPv1dY0ACff3+j SRq5tRvpNexPhdYNh7MxsrE= =q9cp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--