Return-Path: <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BE3421192
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.8
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id d667rZ-DWDNL for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com
	[209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F32E42118E
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwg12 with SMTP id 12so2586495bwg.26
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=microcomaustralia.com.au; s=google;
	h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=iv7xgFWI4wQ0s9E8CmF7Ub9GMoryPOe9C1anrPEZFTI=;
	b=RpwHOzNBCyjDJIxT+itMRFan9x/UBCJaANz+JlmAVpjx8TrkLMrfThn+K71j2gCEB7
	WjM11dqmm+jCJluYsE4xmGSc7JeYkaCKgjiTPYzrSUloaaAB1HtAkEkS5A+sDGEVN140
	J/tkibDMxaT8k7VyZuBb+5eMYK4rGcT4JFvJI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.3.21 with SMTP id 21mr2542536bkl.6.1309483690630; Thu, 30
	Jun 2011 18:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.72.139 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [202.158.218.252]
In-Reply-To: <874o377o70.fsf@praet.org>
References:
 <CAH-f9Ws8oNb_UzzPNGsw0V29Rh0VTK2Tz0voG0QwLPcKTq1fCw@mail.gmail.com>
	<874o377o70.fsf@praet.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:28:10 +1000
Message-ID: <BANLkTikRVTwC-OTkmubq4xTq3BBgpOn=0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Preventing the user shooting themself in the foot
From: Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>
To: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 01:28:14 -0000

On 30 June 2011 17:50, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:
> And AFAIK, "Archive" does *not* mark a message as read in GMail.
> (see previous messages suggesting the inverse)

gmail will mark all messages in the thread as read when looking at any
part of the thread - so in practical terms whenever I click "Archive"
the entire thread is marked as read - as I always click archive in the
message view.

Not absolutely convinced this is the best approach. I think it is
important to appreciate the differences that different implementations
have chosen.
-- 
Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>