MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: awg@xvx.ca
In-Reply-To: <87r4uzailm.fsf@awakening.csail.mit.edu>
References: <1335056093-17621-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
	<1335056093-17621-2-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
	<87r4uzailm.fsf@awakening.csail.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 12:55:18 -0600
Message-ID:
 <CAMoJFUuzUkz-8XPBntT8Jd3K6RHgHrdkK-ZZ4+LD1hw6To3vCw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] test: Replying to an HTML-only message in emacs
From: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
To: Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu> wrote:
> Does the test output depend on the HTML renderer used? =A0(And should
> there be a test dependency on w3m or something? =A0I must admit, I don't
> know how mm's HTML rendering works.)

That's a good question. HTML output does depend on what renderer is
used, but I think the test message is simple enough that they'll all
produce the same output. I believe mm prefers w3m.el, and falls back
to using an external w3m binary, and then emacs's built-in HTML
parsing (I'm significantly less sure whether the last part is true).

I've tried removing w3m and w3m.el from my system, and the test still
passes, so I think we're OK.

-- Adam