From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: John Fremlin <john@fremlin.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: Notmuch success: Xapian database corrupt
In-Reply-To: <87sk6oc5sx.fsf-genuine-vii@john.fremlin.org>
References: <87r5mchmji.fsf-genuine-vii@john.fremlin.org>
	<874oj4wdbn.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<87sk6oc5sx.fsf-genuine-vii@john.fremlin.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:04:50 -0700
Message-ID: <87ljcef0rx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:19:58 +0000, John Fremlin <john@fremlin.org> wrote:
> After the encouraging message from Sebastian. I deleted the
> .notmuch/xapian dir and started again.
>=20
> It went off a good rate (300+ files/sec) and here was the final score
>=20
> Processed 494764 total files in 2h 54m 41s (47 files/sec.).=20=20=20=20=
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
> Added 226817 new messages to the database.

Nice. That's much more like what I'm accustomed to getting.

> This is much faster than before. As I haven't changed the storage or the
> filesystem (ext4,data=3Dordered over encrypted aes-xts-plain), I just
> don't know what made the difference. My kernel is now 2.6.32-21-generic
> #32-Ubuntu and I had an older one the first try a month or so ago.

Thanks for the details at least. Maybe other people having performance
problems can start finding correlations.

=2DCarl

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFL0e9S6JDdNq8qSWgRAjY/AKCgL6kHGvSi85T2aYU2IcqFtDnAuACYmxAP
8LrWbGvbzG3YZpuQcNwb3A==
=lKjf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--