Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C07E431FBF;
	Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:22:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id ReKN0pUpv+Wg; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:22:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0D8431FBC;
	Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:22:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: <1258544095-16616-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
References: <1258544095-16616-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<1258544095-16616-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:22:38 +0100
Message-ID: <87skcbmn9d.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 2/2] reply: Pointer mismatch.
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:22:54 -0000

On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:34:54 +0000, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> Currently the same `pkg-config ...` is executed for every target, so
> just store the results in a variable.

On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:34:55 +0000, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> Apparently typeof (size_t) != unsigned int on my x86-64.

Thanks! Both pushed.

-Carl