Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69FD431FAF for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:05:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AdEoFTSTvPr5 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:05:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1540B431FAE for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:05:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49352E50DDC for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:05:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (unknown [76.89.193.65]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9712E50DDB for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:05:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5F1E645D; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:05:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: new mua mailto: URI handler In-Reply-To: <1327865624-7673-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> References: <1327865624-7673-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <1327865624-7673-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+112~gffb05d6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:05:15 -0700 Message-ID: <87hawmyt8k.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:05:23 -0000 --=-=-= On Sun, Jan 29 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > The new function 'notmuch-mua-mailto' provides an interactive handler > for rfc6068 "mailto:" URIs. It attempts to implement the rfc6068 > specification: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6068 I am using and finding this patch useful. It has no conflict with anything when not used. Is there any other objection with pushing it? jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPidh8AAoJEO00zqvie6q8ej8QAKm5JOJBkd0P7uXPk31PyQ19 XTyFosV04Dd8y3gRSul8WYwF/RXLnj0S0lHK/wg4xZUoE3EMMJbz0hjbJDwRuqjO rT3YmWPoSeOG8zk/ewJYGLa7OD46EjmG046tRzZfEgsvw3x9sdRtcMHPd1ABc1RD tQN+UHNw3eZlnOGqjk4w/FrDttjJa1GoeNztJHsaW0upvIO1QwUsThmIhpIgwdKr m1YQQyctStZxXXVcjzIljyQi7Yhkxy919oR3UF6vRRc5jEkBxs7DRZHn31wS6/09 yTiO8xTYRGMx0N9El6KEYjoNvOu/4TIBvR4WncIIR3LmoGycxW5pKff3+H6Fz2Uh oo7L3mI/imLGGaaMEQIilxO//XrTLY0P6i6PZKCr4gQVJ4coWDSMwrCbTd9/lnRA rvMkhTLH6qANw9UY8t0vQKzz/J+ElnwbyVEvRhFS+Dhqh8ePOf0LZ/tBP17L5gJX Gn8zm8+zRrlb0M/VvVbxNjrZkVRqeD0H+AkPGKcco66BZiYj/kvhR1PlUsJinEqS 9VJ8LwDJT3j7bmHKBpnfV1O/x75+AtBbprJA47aNOpkir97s0U+Rfnee+YNQ6Ot5 /TjqW5kDOkO1dYeJRUYWrMGaC1PmcDOdGYpumQiE+D2ZoZ3odPilqKepBXLr6TW4 F7jqf18Uvw2kLW5jeuL2 =Btkz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--