Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746966DE11EC for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2016 02:03:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.618 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.618 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.202, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZRegrDQ3oB_S for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2016 02:03:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49BFF6DE1003 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2016 02:03:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id l68so22203255wml.0 for ; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 02:03:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=QNGbuvwVUkyijzVp09SQML4MzB5WOxNEJvea6V4UA8o=; b=LV+kCD+VoYFsb54qW4bmSYpiOKpDtZi2Gn5t1uD+QmmtZNSrJTgOrOaDGkEdi2xfkQ 8MJ/e5S2t3m4vnDWLqj0BStrJyRyVPhJgg/dumDzm7trVd0pQwRNZPpC+rExsnEer7fA oqUgGxaAUgOnKOAmKwG6xbIumJaT1pRO6vi5xVmqO/YeHZJDFd09RD31/IG1lkUzRD3M wXc+PMg0ECptUErZ1OM8fEfNY3qZ0QnJJYZN+ciO7NgnHjdy1uaNceWanQzNTy4zeGqM pV3hbbu7lBHnHzdvJIn4qKSwywipSSPd3wnpOm/9H4Peffy0kGYoUN7vQe5RdkT3Rrn9 OsXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=QNGbuvwVUkyijzVp09SQML4MzB5WOxNEJvea6V4UA8o=; b=kjF0xwHABiSylnuEZhjqmhmR3JMx4mhQ0phbs4v0frVSFID6GxpsCRovrLfWlJLOEc vRzmF3vxrTtTHEDGdd0pPfWg3NXmYfTXAq+45PEtYCLyPL5IeEqimexCssmhc2ei+JBU MO/4rvFfB/UeyRhhJQgZ0mzHrLDMuCmGPm3Id3lOsb8slTQOEycF8ylLC8zvJXe2+WwB tXyzVeyRlmaGhu9ufZQQvP5mQ9z+AHtku9AzTXetBExeyMG/2CIS28RDVMEsbS38/t2p g0sfkJCO/Q6RsrQmqLdF6QOekmn2D9fGl9rCoBCz1ZijtxkPMzoFFpZPuceYe4ixQ7q2 QHMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ4qH7AgCF6+O3CGpZtc9es1SYAj6zZG7GcFrmYRKNCamY6ossG+7HcoF8LSlGTjg== X-Received: by 10.28.59.212 with SMTP id i203mr2911645wma.69.1457172187748; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 02:03:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from Samskara (cpc14-walt14-2-0-cust716.13-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.21.102.205]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 82sm3116055wmd.4.2016.03.05.02.03.06 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 05 Mar 2016 02:03:06 -0800 (PST) From: Sam Halliday To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: use font-face instead of explicit colouring In-Reply-To: <87mvqdmer2.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87mvqdmer2.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 10:03:04 +0000 Message-ID: <87k2lhmecn.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 10:03:11 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain I should say that I am aware of the workaround, e.g. (setq notmuch-search-line-faces '(("unread" :weight bold) ("flagged" :inherit 'font-lock-string-face))) but this must be applied per-user. If you removed this defcustom and had unread/flagged/other faces, then themes (such as darcula) would be able to provide sensible defaults out of the box. --=-=-= Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --==-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sam Halliday writes: > [ text/plain ] > Hi, > > I use a dark theme and many of the colour choices of notmuch collide > with my theme. However, notmuch is explicitly adding information such as > "blue foreground" instead of using faces that I can customise. > > Could you please consider using faces instead of explicit colours? > > [ text/plain ] > > --=20 > Best regards, > Sam > [ signature.asc: application/pgp-signature ] =2D-=20 Best regards, Sam --==-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlbartgACgkQh5Q4qVL9G8kEmACfU3t0x0vfkNgY8kUYId7CErx7 nLQAniQ4AOQe0VzDpl2ohBoUvvf09qNN =4rO4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==-=-=-- --=-=-=--