Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00EB40DBFA for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:35:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p50XPicPUUTZ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:35:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3259540DDC5; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:35:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B9D3225412B; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:35:31 -0800 (PST) From: Carl Worth To: Jameson Rollins , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: add some convenience functions to show mode In-Reply-To: <87zktbeekd.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <87zktbeekd.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:35:31 -0800 Message-ID: <87k4kddpto.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:35:42 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:09:01 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote: > While these are not currently bound to any keys, I have found them to > be very useful for constructing custom key bindings outside of what > notmuch provides by default. These look fairly handy. But, since I know our current keybindings are less-than-perfect, I would prefer to see patches that also fix them, (rather than just adding functionality that new users can't get at without manual customization). Would you accept an invitation to make a proposal (with patch) to actually improve the default keybindings here as well? I haven't pushed the patch, while awaiting your response to the above. =2DCarl =2D-=20 carl.d.worth@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFM4t0D6JDdNq8qSWgRAq4BAKCCDEu3ctRj/k+TY6QZEJu2aTxYAwCfakrw 8aN9sptavl2FUvs44FSzXOQ= =EjOS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--