Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7E3431FB6 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:10:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.463 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vBisNklnn-S4 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net [88.164.105.66]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2FB431FB5 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1]) by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id C948E2C062; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:10:18 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=postfix; bh=z/ylQEnCPRldK5VSbHvPI3 ac5Bw=; b=NdBMXzD+zcyOZfz+l1IvlJcjKP/1fImNZi27yQPEbl872YwlFFm1HI 1v0Gl7FjqPBqJQI89NvQHsBdy+pBm5uc5m5czXFFdLoEAPUtNfCJWr96PcbJ9Cte lXuOI0n4qwGfeggVxZBPsYy1XAptmX/45s4RD7RPvnRsqNP6i7iAk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=maillard.im; h=from:to :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=postfix; b=guNqPMZ7VkOS38sl hvZGzth3f6xMdWfCRscqtFh/L5DSgUPljKaDvl+v+rc0wUnie8oQeHDhY5MNHGQZ ijvaZrpk441eGPuToOWhLy4heBwqZjvBuEKWEXciVDR/rv549Gs5OE01KjnIPhup fNQgySrLW705hW/x/8ezXgODG3U= Received: from maillard.im (unknown [192.168.0.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:10:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Xavier Maillard To: Michael Radziej , Florian Friesdorf , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages In-Reply-To: <87tydutuhk.fsf@spieleck.de> References: <8739ll8dkv.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net> <87mxjphl55.fsf@spieleck.de> <87wrirtn58.fsf@spieleck.de> <87tydutuhk.fsf@spieleck.de> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-133-gc509598 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-slackware-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:20:53 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Xavier Maillard List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:10:22 -0000 On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:18:15 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:29:53 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > Thank you for your answer. Dumb question: are procmail and IMAP "closed > > to friends" ? I would think yes but only on server side, right or > > wrong ? > > "Closed to friends?" No idea what you mean. I mean, is it something usual to have both procmail and IMAP in a "mail flow" ? > Can you please describe your mail flow? Mine is currently quite simple: postfix/dovecot/sieve on a remote machine <-> offlineimap/notmuch (plus a tagging script). My goal is to use notmuch remotely directly on my IMAP server but there are problems when doing notmuch new in the dovecot tree (dovecot index files if I recall correctly). /Xavier