Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20AD0431FAF for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 05:50:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ig29Or5JjfdW for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 05:50:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97125431FAE for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 05:50:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VmkwU-0003g8-D8; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 09:50:42 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 17978 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 30 Nov 2013 13:50:38 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] emacs: Makefile.local: HAVE_EMACS usage fixes In-Reply-To: <1377630047-27756-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> References: <1377630047-27756-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17~rc2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 09:50:38 -0400 Message-ID: <87ob523snl.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 13:50:57 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: > > ifeq ($(WITH_EMACS),1) > ifeq ($(HAVE_EMACS),1) > all: $(emacs_bytecode) > +install-emacs: $(emacs_bytecode) > endif > It's a bit confusing that we have both HAVE_EMACS and WITH_EMACS. Should this be documented somewhere? Otherwise the patch seems sensible. See also the discussion at id:528B455A.70200@iki.fi. d