Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F776431FBC for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 02:09:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q3ls5WdtaIiB for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 02:09:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96CCD431FB6 for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 02:09:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xahp3-0007pv-Ix; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 06:09:45 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 27630 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:09:35 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] NEWS: mention the change in default build flags In-Reply-To: References: <1412488408-25699-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+98~gae27403 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 11:09:35 +0200 Message-ID: <877g0eq3w0.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:09:52 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: > On Sun, Oct 05 2014, David Bremner wrote: > >> It blows things up by a factor of six or so, so it's worth giving >> people a heads up. It won't effect e.g. Debian, that already builds >> with -g and then strips. > > Maybe SomeOne(=E2=84=A2) could make a patch that strip(1)s at make instal= l time ? > Then I guess the NEWS item would be unneeded? d