To: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>,
	Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg@xvx.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] emacs: Use the new JSON reply format.
In-Reply-To: <87k44xgw09.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <1326009162-19524-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
	<1326009162-19524-5-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
	<cun62gl1cqv.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
	<CAMoJFUt8F417wzSmiHDv2KHa9y5ARYh=xRHKEsWBXYXHfaN64A@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k44xgw09.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+186~gd0f7804 (http://notmuchmail.org)
	Emacs/24.0.92.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:07:40 +0000
Message-ID: <cunzkdtkttf.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:33:58 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> I did not follow the rest of the discussion, so sorry if I missed
> something obvious.  But why can't we render HTML parts in replies the
> same way we do in notmuch-show (using `mm-display-part')?  That should
> not introduce a w3m.el requirement, would use the same renderer as
> configured for show and hence would produce consistent output in show
> and reply.

Agreed, that would be good. It could be done as a second stage, though.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk8OzQwACgkQaezQq/BJZRbV0QCeJ8i18celFbObMRb+xuf4noFV
hs0An1gsnM1auF21mofCKh3OPY4MX8Tl
=LxsK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--