Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8031431FBD for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 12:59:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WtEZcSB6o1jg for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 12:59:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 077C7431FBC for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 12:59:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WA48b-0003zD-59; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 16:59:33 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 7988 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 02 Feb 2014 20:59:27 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Mark Walters , Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure: only install bash completion if supported In-Reply-To: <877g9dqup5.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> References: <1391359677-12497-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org> <877g9dqup5.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17~rc3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 16:59:27 -0400 Message-ID: <878utt1b9s.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 20:59:42 -0000 Mark Walters writes: > This LGTM (untested) I did test it, at least completely removing bash completion works as expected. Unfortunately --with-bash-completion does not override this test because the order things are processed. Do you think this is a bug? I wondered if users that "know what they are doing" (TM) might want to force installation even though the pkg-config test fails. d