Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A27431FC0 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:21:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.438 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6e-XR-LYQSZl for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:21:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E15431FBC for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:21:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96983100086 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:20:45 +0200 (EET) From: Tomi Ollila To: Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: "bouncing" messages In-Reply-To: <87r5m1lqr9.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <87633spft6.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87vdbrokwi.fsf@london087.server4you.de> <87y6gjc7fg.fsf@algae.riseup.net> <87bpdcju1v.fsf@yahoo.com.br> <87r5m1lqr9.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+92~g402df12 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:21:12 -0000 On Tue, Apr 27 2010, Carl Worth wrote: > On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:54:20 -0300, Fernando Carrijo wrote: >> micah anderson wrote: >> > It would be great if this became a key to make this easier. In mutt, >> > that key is 'b', which prompts you who you should send the message >> > to. That key is already bound to showing the body in notmuch, but I'm >> > sure there are other options. >> >> Carl just dropped that binding, so now we can reuse 'b' to message bouncing. > > I was just about to say the same thing. I'm all for 'b' for bouncing, (I > think I first used that in pine long, long ago...) ... and anyone still interested can check out id:"1423229911-14784-1-git-send-email-too@guru.guru-group.fi" and bikeshed it further. (I think the XXX comment can just be dropped but what about the extra magic in minibuffer keymaps...)? Tomi > > -Carl > > -- > carl.d.worth@intel.com