From: "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>, Carl Worth
	<cworth@cworth.org>, racin@free.fr
In-Reply-To: <87tyt61mrl.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
References:
 <1161359196.2247691263984967906.JavaMail.root@zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net>
	<87sk8qwjlt.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<87tyt61mrl.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:53:14 +0100
Message-ID: <87eik9bn8l.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] add notmuch-show-delete keybinding 'd'
Precedence: list

On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:01:18 -0500, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> > 2. It removes the "inbox" and "unread" tags while adding the tag to
> >    indicate deletion.
> 
> Hey, Carl.  Why is this last point important? [...]Why should it modify any other
> tags?  A message/thread should be allowed to be both deleted and in the
> inbox.

As long as deleted threads/messages show up in the default views, I
don't want them to show up in my inbox or show up as unread. I agree
that it might be possible to have "unread" yet "delete"d emails. But in
reality, if I delete a message I don't want it to pop up in my inbox.

Feel free to apply patches however you want though, thanks to emacs,
I'll be able to get my desired behavior nonetheless :).

> As for "unread", I think that should be handled by actually reading the
> message, not by manually applying a state to it.

I agree, but deleting a message in my world view resets the unread tag
(as in, I don't want to read it anymore).

Sebastian