Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98826431FBF for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 17:36:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k0qms8ipy54g for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 17:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CF70431FAE for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 17:36:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4R0aWcP004592; Sun, 26 May 2013 21:36:32 -0300 Received: from remotemail by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UglQO-0006Fw-7d; Sun, 26 May 2013 21:36:32 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 7409 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 27 May 2013 00:36:29 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] man: document notmuch count --output=files In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+69~g360c3c8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 21:36:29 -0300 Message-ID: <878v31l0mq.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 00:36:41 -0000 Other than the bikeshed about starting from zero instead of one, and not being completely happy with the option name --duplicate (but not being inspired to suggest a better one), this series looks OK to me. It seems like it would be quite useful to query based on the number of duplicates, but that is a much more ambitious task, I think. d