Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A474A6DE17CB for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 04:58:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.092 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.002, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mUW1Vop2EV82 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 04:58:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.solardns.com (mx1.solardns.com [109.73.127.119]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9073D6DE17BA for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 04:58:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [213.129.84.218] (helo=luna.solardns.com) by mx1.solardns.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aXTaT-0003aF-DI for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 12:58:11 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=deptj.eu; s=default; h=Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:To:Subject:From; bh=qygzBr9r52UF+naunwo+Tl3FvTeo3/XC8VNdqzUxgqA=; b=mRrwFfAH+dSgWBg/445NB7BPUA nAMVB1EpCHWogrgzMPKMTZmK+SvnM1r/449dHMisox5fccIGFHqDJOui4qOgEoztTPAkSLN7DxIAX x/47v1Uz6l2itxB0SOMeyOmg21VTAMpe+qG0nmQboOpMpqcbns8In+wAIR9L7ZHuZpRM=; Received: from [2.2.97.150] (port=46415 helo=bruno.deptj.eu) by luna.solardns.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aXTaR-000EbB-0Q for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 12:58:07 +0000 Received: from eric by bruno.deptj.eu with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXTaQ-0004A1-90 for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 13:58:06 +0100 From: Eric J Subject: Re: Lost updates to Notmuch database To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <337393ce5e2484d64f837a44b2c4f2ea32f91295-NM@bruno.deptj.eu> References: <337393ce5e2484d64f837a44b2c4f2ea32f91295-NM@bruno.deptj.eu> Message-ID: <6d9d87c8bbd4c9499574382a9aa1d868a41f525a-NM@bruno.deptj.eu> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 13:57:30 +0100 (CET) X-AuthUser: deptjeu X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIZxxbsbMXbbOVqDrOlLQDPCKLoLP9dSDpksiPa3sfcfQiw3bi2TEXpBy KOgMDJLxZ2gLr13hkJnqYlE8dI2PqoFC/lGsrXcsS0xY0J18f6o7xB66CWvXcfKDfXjTU++u662M z3XPM5R9v27pdedIXT7jhdsctnIq2KCvTWA5QwCNZuM7jUXIESohoO51xWmU8U0XxLGz4gGrl7np YUMMsx7Zx6js8RMGZ+eyCM03IideZE/8G6RrW+hPYRmHOym9VEp4OmAp9SwcFw57ijAOXur1H/aA warQpYDOYx/6JtUOKIpz/KyJk6xidDbrtJGeIvwS+mRNB2u5eXMTyiRDCl4blv/7/GYDGL6pBAPx 3RhxuHrpSpJU4PQlqFj9797wgsGhIeDBws4kvu4hgViYIJSOH7FelTFEA57OugCjQqJvq5XDlSi1 S/CAqp6x6giLUpAadaOpLL7vzAlHz9Vt0lJbH3q7FSJEAvmcpRDg+DcXMCx8qKfWo/2nfeswSb/v XOidX4Ts4xdG+C13IyWeZaJClvAWyUAUCSYHhmge3quet8geXjZWRvaT/RbJ/nX/IFFm7SbdEzck 901Ob2Iq9tC/Vh1lis0iI/S1HLwoHXf0 X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@mx1.solardns.com X-Filter-Fingerprint: IFrWXGses7OKB5S5G8/dJdIz5bb8V0ykx8BnFBnunHBA3cTUQ1R++keuE7RDJ8Kg3RbMLUalw1oC mj99/u+Poh38tEMU4IgC4sNz49qn3HHnhRv/ZJ3kEy8bfiAr+Fb/UpndEJ0YoaLytXXo8BMTaVt0 ARHRi6XGuAluI1udprGClI6bm+u9ssQgM5AHe3Zacv4uJct5wtJvPpZ2dlBHCwDSxr3Vz+LJ/RhM 2JZ0ECN5dnq47RWft7iCyM9+PbHelB4qP9S6mTzNwoPraFy6ieiDqMHb2a0eZvGOvr7RaxKWGCKO us9nABr0Pk/4CplP X-Originating-IP: 213.129.84.218 X-SpamExperts-Domain: out.solardns.com X-SpamExperts-Username: 213.129.84.218 Authentication-Results: solardns.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=213.129.84.218@out.solardns.com X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: unsure X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.42) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 12:58:17 -0000 On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:44:23 +0100 (CET), Eric J wrote: > Using the API, I am adding single mail files, already in the maildir, to > the Notmuch database and tagging them. It works, every time, as long as > I run it one file at a time. > > However, if I do it twice, in different processes, at the same time, one > file is added and tagged properly, the other is not (totally unfindable > by notmuch search). Neither process reports any error, and they both log > their actions normally. Actually a third simultaneous process also fails > to leave any result in the database. 8>< -------- > > The wrapper around the API for Tcl is very simple, and I can not see any > way for that or Tcl itself to cause this sort of problem. Beyond this, > I haven't thought of any way to decide if this could be a Notmuch problem > or a Xapian problem. 8>< -------- Well, after some experimenting, this is not specific to Notmuch at all. Xapian itself has Tcl bindings, and they also silently fail to lock the file. So does putting a minimally changed copy of Xapian's locking code directly in a Tcl extension, though that code works when called from a tiny C main program instead. So thanks for looking, I will report here if I find out why. Eric -- ms fnd in a lbry