Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971A6421192 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:29:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91d4IUa+zI9K for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.43.72.2]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7FB421186 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D0C29A64A; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:29:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2781854C045; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:29:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: martin f krafft , notmuch discussion list Subject: Re: patchwork In-Reply-To: <20110630090114.GA10571@albatross.gern.madduck.net> References: <20110630090114.GA10571@albatross.gern.madduck.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:29:54 -0700 Message-ID: <87y60j2sfx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:29:55 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:01:14 +0200, martin f krafft w= rote: > Are people using http://patchwork.notmuchmail.org at all? The reason > of my asking is that it receives quite a lot of spam and I do not > need to invest this time for a service noone uses. I have not been using it. I dos appreciate your concern for keeping the notmuch community vibrant and your volunteer efforts to setup this service. But if it's costing more time now than it's worth, please feel free to drop it (unless someone else says differently of course). =2DCarl =2D-=20 carl.d.worth@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4MpIIACgkQ6JDdNq8qSWj8JgCfYzsWMNTNoD4CgJWaD1XyMDpL xiUAoJ/UfmpBHAzwfKYw65x97dNJcy3B =/x94 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--