Return-Path: <bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64083431FBD
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:52:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.131
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.131 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[AWL=-0.132, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id RAvVtIsmynMK for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:52:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pivot.cs.unb.ca (pivot.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.57])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51D8431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:52:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from
	fctnnbsc30w-142167166109.pppoe-dynamic.high-speed.nb.bellaliant.net
	([142.167.166.109] helo=rocinante.cs.unb.ca)
	by pivot.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca>)
	id 1Nf8Ik-00085S-Pb; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:52:02 -0400
Received: from bremner by rocinante.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bremner@rocinante.cs.unb.ca>)
	id 1Nf8G6-0002cf-Ks; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:49:18 -0400
From: David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca>
To: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: <20100210032503.GA19427@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
References: <87d4148s2c.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net>
	<4B595D3A.1030901@SSpaeth.de> <87636u34lw.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
	<87d411zvz8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<20100125213231.GB15987@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
	<960df8f6a8a08f2ca3aceef5a216d691.squirrel@webmail.sspaeth.de>
	<87wrz4fqsw.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net>
	<20100127194149.GA23034@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
	<20100128070522.GA18649@ukfsn.org>
	<20100201223112.GA20288@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
	<20100210032503.GA19427@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:49:18 -0400
Message-ID: <87tytpjx0x.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Sender-Verified: bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca
Subject: Re: [notmuch] patchwork test instance
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:52:04 -0000

On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:25:03 +1300, martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net> wrote:
> 
> Are people actually using it? I know that merging patches is
> impossible, and that sucks, but otherwise: is this something to keep
> around, or should I take the site offline again?

I'm not sure what merging patches means here; some kind of squash
operation?  Anyway it seemed to me that every every patch series that I
looked at was broken into individual patches. Maybe I am just unlucky,
or does patchwork really not understand the concept of series of patches
in a thread?

d