Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2521431FB6 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 05:00:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.463 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KvMFRkDIlbMn for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 05:00:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net [88.164.105.66]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1E1431FB5 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 05:00:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1]) by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69EA1E07A; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:00:35 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=postfix; bh=zJVhrZx4NAiFq0mYG96yAC ZwqZQ=; b=oQAmbDuzLrpNmu1e0QZANfvNQ6/EPp2ZE4osBlMSPbC0xNGWRWz8rt mA/hKyjr56z2mbvhu9h7VNDiQv1dJ5EdgWsimq+KLD0UzLgdoIYCsig3hsau4TwF 55dKzEE4u4xEw5NQ00/dCrxnoFwvIXU7iAG+GGsm4E/Ty/dQAKZuU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=maillard.im; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=postfix; b=Wa4XlDT7araswtss vjC0zx5txRoDu+bz9npwCPNDeApuS+a6vR0iaDG8/AsfMacIdUhwoewdV5Y72jGk UUM5+1FrUQbevrW0lnGs1uP7BDGr0miPLzVTXCe8mvOWstb1Ri/Il0EmWMnSAiHb Ihe51EleDlx/FrpPr9rkJvvU+UI= Received: from maillard.im (unknown [192.168.0.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:00:35 +0100 (CET) From: Xavier Maillard To: Sebastien Binet , Jesse Rosenthal , Daniel Kahn Gillmor , Jameson Rollins Subject: Re: ordering threads by the latest message in a thread ? In-Reply-To: <87lj1px9fp.fsf@cern.ch> References: <87zkq5y2tq.fsf@cern.ch> <878vxp2ii5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <4D52DB62.5060604@fifthhorseman.net> <87lj1px9fp.fsf@cern.ch> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-103-gb7d5f9b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-slackware-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:09:56 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Xavier Maillard List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:00:47 -0000 Hi Sebastien, On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 21:03:06 +0100, Sebastien Binet wrote: > so, say I have the following messages and threads: > id_0 1/3 [important meeting] - (received Monday) > id_1 2/3 [important meeting] - (received Tuesday) > id_2 1/1 [pick groceries] - (received Wednesday) > id_3 3/3 [important meeting] - (received Thursday) > id_4 1/1 [another title] - (received Friday morning) > > if I have 'Search Oldest first' "on", I'd get the following > id_0 [and id_1 and id_3 folded in] > id_2 > id_4 > > and if it is "off": > id_4 > id_0 [and id_1 and id_3 folded in] > id_2 > > but what I'd like to have is instead: > id_2 > id_0 [and id_1 and id_3 folded in] > id_4 THat's also what I am used to have at work with Thunderbird. I'd also see this implemented one day. /Xavier