MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To:
 <CAMP44s2ATDkix0OKEc6c9pZrudnYk=7tCme=d+VJcfeivFRhew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87txzsgs4g.fsf@zancas.localnet>
	<cover.1336402558.git.alip@exherbo.org>
	<1559639bc5e9e3253f2ee2220a8d8d00c39d9d43.1336402558.git.alip@exherbo.org>
	<CAMP44s15Q6F9bA0MirS3zyBU3AqomH7wKBmLvqEtAnBnzHrw=g@mail.gmail.com>
	<878vgi1ign.fsf@zancas.localnet>
	<CAMP44s2ATDkix0OKEc6c9pZrudnYk=7tCme=d+VJcfeivFRhew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:13:21 +0200
Message-ID:
 <CAMP44s2i5d71AOzW_D+uVoTQE3NQ_8xsfs8ePyU5SY-wsJaWgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ruby: Add workarounds to use in-tree build not the
	installed one
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Ali Polatel <alip@exherbo.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:22 AM, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:

>> I do plan on a bug fix release, to fix an annoying emacs interface bug
>> if nothing else. I'd rather see a fix/revert coordinated with Ali in his
>> role as ruby bindings maintainer.
>
> Well, sure, if possible that would be best. But I doubt the ruby
> bindings maintainer would complain about making the Ruby bindings work
> again :)
>
> Worst-case scenario we would end up with what we had before.

Since I've seen no better alternatives to fix the problem, I've
reverted the patch and pushed to 'master'. Would be nice to pick it
for 'release'.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras