From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
To: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com>,
	Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>,
	Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: Preventing the user shooting themself in the foot
In-Reply-To: <87vcvnnh7r.fsf@canonical.com>
References: <86iproe86u.fsf@greenrd.plus.com>
	<87fwms45xz.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<BANLkTi=StMS67+UwQbm8cUH3yNr_ySrN5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<874o37513c.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<87vcvnnh7r.fsf@canonical.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-315-g34bd5eb (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.50.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 19:11:06 +0200
Message-ID: <87boxeq639.fsf@praet.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Precedence: list

On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:26:48 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:40:07 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
> Non-text part: multipart/mixed
> Non-text part: multipart/signed
> 
> not sure why notmuch reply is putting that there :)
> 
> > The lack of a "move to next thread" binding helps encourage me to form
> > good habits. The goal I have when processing my inbox is to get
> > everything *out* of my inbox. I can do that by deciding one of several
> > common things:
> > 
> >     * I have nothing to do
> > 
> > 	In this case I should just archive the message immediately
> > 
> >     * I can deal with this message "on the spot" (such as a quick reply)
> > 
> > 	In this case, I should deal with the message, then archive it
> > 
> >     * I can't deal with this now, but need to later
> > 
> > 	This is the key scenario. The wrong thing to do is to leave the
> > 	message in my inbox, (that just makes things pile up and makes
> > 	my future inbox processing slow, demotivating, and
> > 	unreliable). The right thing to do is to tag this message in a
> > 	way that I'm sure I'll find it again when I will be equipped to
> > 	deal with it. And then I can archive the message.
> 
> I'm come to strongly agree that this is the Right Way to process email
> too, so should there be a keybinding for this last operation?  It should
> tag the message (or the thread?) with, say, 'task', and then proceeded
> as 'a' does.  'task' should be in the default searches you get in
> the notmuch hello buffer.

#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
  (define-key notmuch-show-mode-map "t"
    (lambda()
      "Flag and archive currently selected message, and move to the next.
If this is the last message, move to the next thread."
      (interactive)
      (notmuch-show-add-tag "flagged")
      (notmuch-show-advance-and-archive)))
#+END_SRC

Note that I use the "flagged" tag, since this corresponds to a maildir
flag, and can be synced via IMAP.

> I realize there is endless bikeshedding to be done on tag names and so
> on and also on allowing people to choose their own workflow, but I also
> think that this shouldn't stop the addition of a sensible default :)
> 
> Cheers,
> mwh
> _______________________________________________
> notmuch mailing list
> notmuch@notmuchmail.org
> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Peace

-- 
Pieter