Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B0C431FAF for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:08:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YZzcA6zv4OCT for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:08:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6951C431FAE for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:08:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by bkty12 with SMTP id y12so1901432bkt.26 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:08:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.150.7 with SMTP id w7mr5884185bkv.107.1326906526896; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:08:46 -0800 (PST) Sender: awg@xvx.ca Received: by 10.205.33.73 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:08:46 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [208.77.198.202] In-Reply-To: References: <1326904354-22419-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:08:46 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: RavA7PsXoY56Fk17Jnjm5n5edr4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] emacs: Use the new JSON reply format. From: Adam Wolfe Gordon To: David Edmondson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:08:49 -0000 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:41, David Edmondson wrote: > I think that this looks pretty good now. We should get some experience > of using it. Thanks for the reviews and guidance - I think the patch is in much better shape than when it started. FWIW, I've been using the original w3-based version of the patch for a while now, and the mm-based version since I sent it. It works well with all the emails I've tested it with, but almost all the email I get is HTML-only. I'd like to hear some experiences from people trying it on multipart/alternative messages and others.