From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
To: Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@fernseed.info>,
	Peter Portante <peter.a.portante@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16
In-Reply-To: <87vcosmn04.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>
References: <4F037CA3.5020501@gmail.com>
	<87vcosmn04.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+176~g3f9d738 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:31:39 +0200
Message-ID: <yf6sjjlf6fo.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Precedence: list

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:36:59 +0000, Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@fernseed.info> wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante <peter.a.portante@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been 
> > able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under 
> > Fedora 16.
> 
> Looks like we have a growing Fedora community, yay! :-)
> 
> And it's nothing you're doing wrong, per my reply to the other thread
> F16 is using the current development version of gmime which has API
> differences with the stable version 2.4.  The patch that exists isn't
> part of standard notmuch since it in turn breaks 2.4 compatibility.
> 
> What's the right way to handle this?  I see 2.6 tarballs on gnome... is
> 2.6 officially out there and stable?

Some conditional compilation by #if(def)ing some *GMIME* macro...

While doing something else I passed by these messages:

http://www.mail-archive.com/notmuch@notmuchmail.org/msg05829.html
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=269819

These seems to provide valuable information to anyone attempting
to compile notmuch with gmime 2.5+

Tomi