Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8780431FC2 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 06:28:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b9v8POIj-Z6T for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 06:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpauth.johnshopkins.edu (smtpauth.johnshopkins.edu [128.220.229.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BB61431FB6 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 06:28:00 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,810,1406606400"; d="scan'208";a="485201920" Received: from guppy.hwcampus.jhu.edu (HELO localhost) ([10.161.32.234]) by IPMTW3.johnshopkins.edu with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 29 Oct 2014 09:28:01 -0400 From: Jesse Rosenthal To: Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid empty thread names if possible. In-Reply-To: <87a94f2fe3.fsf@jhu.edu> References: <87oatnakqy.fsf@jhu.edu> <87tx2nuvec.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <87a94f2fe3.fsf@jhu.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.2+155~gafa8535 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:27:59 -0400 Message-ID: <87tx2n9fa8.fsf@jhu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:28:07 -0000 Hmm, that's strange -- my inital detailed response to Mark's message didn't go through to the list. I wonder if it's being filtered or something.