Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F65431FD0
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:07:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id kDN00+xvmiE4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:07:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40DD7431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:07:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zancas.localnet
	(fctnnbsc36w-156034079193.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net
	[156.34.79.193]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBTM72UY006040
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:07:03 -0400
Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
	id 1RgO7q-0001wh-CS; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:07:02 -0400
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
	Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing.
In-Reply-To: <1325103269-14599-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
References: <1325005901-21374-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
	<1325103269-14599-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11~rc1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:07:02 -0400
Message-ID: <87ipkz6ni1.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:07:18 -0000

On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:14:29 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> It appears to be an oversight that encrypted parts were indexed
> previously.  The terms generated from encrypted parts are meaningless
> and do nothing but add bloat to the database.  It is not worth
> indexing the encrypted content, just as it's not worth indexing the
> signatures in signed parts.

Pushed.

d