Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D67C431FD0 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:42:58 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iVNUWm+JXXpF for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:42:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FC1C431FB6 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:42:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by eekd41 with SMTP id d41so17374842eek.26 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:42:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.22.140 with SMTP id n12mr11375186ebb.53.1325335372202; Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:42:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe5cdc00-23.dhcp.inet.fi. [80.220.92.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a60sm161995768eeb.4.2011.12.31.04.42.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:42:50 -0800 (PST) From: Jani Nikula To: David Bremner , David Edmondson , Dmitry Kurochkin , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] emacs: unify search mechanisms In-Reply-To: <87aa6a6rxi.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <1324786495-14221-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> <87aa6a6rxi.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+146~g646b670 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:42:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87boqoap4o.fsf@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 12:42:58 -0000 On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:43:37 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:44:28 +0000, David Edmondson wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 08:14:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin > > Were there actual complaints about the usability of the current > > approach? > > > > I much preferred your alternative approach (merging the history while > > leaving the UI alone). FWIW, I liked this approach too. I do use the notmuch-hello view, and also the search box. > Personally I would like to be able to customize the hello screen to > remove the search box. I find it confusing that that 's' jumps to the > search box there, and everywhere else brings up the mini-buffer. That > might be just me, and the fact that I bind "C-c s" globally to > notmuch-search. I could easily believe that for new users having a > search box is nicer. Would it be a suitable compromise to bind 's' to notmuch-search (the mini-buffer search) also in notmuch-hello, while leaving the search box there with a common history? I'm not sure moving the point to search box needs a keybinding (but notmuch-hello-goto-search could still be there if the user wants to add a keybinding). BR, Jani.